<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2019 (11) TMI 569 - CESTAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=388320</link>
    <description>The Tribunal held that the date of import should be determined based on when the goods are cleared for home consumption, not the date of filing the Bill of Entry. The appellant was entitled to duty exemptions and partial exemption as the goods were re-exported within one year from clearance, leading to the appeal being allowed and providing consequential relief to the appellant.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 18 Apr 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 12 Nov 2019 17:53:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=593949" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2019 (11) TMI 569 - CESTAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=388320</link>
      <description>The Tribunal held that the date of import should be determined based on when the goods are cleared for home consumption, not the date of filing the Bill of Entry. The appellant was entitled to duty exemptions and partial exemption as the goods were re-exported within one year from clearance, leading to the appeal being allowed and providing consequential relief to the appellant.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 18 Apr 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=388320</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>