<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2019 (11) TMI 565 - CESTAT AHMEDABAD</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=388316</link>
    <description>The tribunal ruled in favor of the appellant, stating that the entire transaction was a sale and purchase of the machine, with no separate service involved. The judgment highlighted that in cases of imported machines, artificially bifurcating the service value from the total value was not sustainable. The appeal was allowed, setting aside the impugned order and remanding the case for further examination of factual details by the original authority.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 17 Sep 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 13 Nov 2019 10:07:05 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=593943" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2019 (11) TMI 565 - CESTAT AHMEDABAD</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=388316</link>
      <description>The tribunal ruled in favor of the appellant, stating that the entire transaction was a sale and purchase of the machine, with no separate service involved. The judgment highlighted that in cases of imported machines, artificially bifurcating the service value from the total value was not sustainable. The appeal was allowed, setting aside the impugned order and remanding the case for further examination of factual details by the original authority.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 17 Sep 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=388316</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>