<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2019 (11) TMI 554 - CESTAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=388305</link>
    <description>The Tribunal, following Supreme Court precedents, held that physician samples manufactured on job work basis and sold on principal-to-principal basis should be valued based on the cost of raw material, job charges, and profit of the job worker. The Tribunal set aside the orders passed by the Commissioner of Central Excise and allowed the appeals, aligning with established legal principles in similar cases.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 03 Sep 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 13 Nov 2019 10:06:35 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=593928" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2019 (11) TMI 554 - CESTAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=388305</link>
      <description>The Tribunal, following Supreme Court precedents, held that physician samples manufactured on job work basis and sold on principal-to-principal basis should be valued based on the cost of raw material, job charges, and profit of the job worker. The Tribunal set aside the orders passed by the Commissioner of Central Excise and allowed the appeals, aligning with established legal principles in similar cases.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 03 Sep 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=388305</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>