<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>Court Rejects Claim: Payment Under Protest Doesn&#039;t Meet MVAT Act Section 26(6A) Pre-Deposit Requirement.</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=50178</link>
    <description>Compliance with the pre-deposit - adjustment of duty paid under protest during investigation - the petitioner cannot contend that because a paltry amount was deposited under protest prior to the assessment and at the time of investigation, that be adjusted against the pre-deposit contemplated by section 26(6A) of as compliance with subsection (6A) of section 26 of the MVAT Act.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 13 Nov 2019 10:06:27 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 13 Nov 2019 10:06:27 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=593927" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>Court Rejects Claim: Payment Under Protest Doesn&#039;t Meet MVAT Act Section 26(6A) Pre-Deposit Requirement.</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=50178</link>
      <description>Compliance with the pre-deposit - adjustment of duty paid under protest during investigation - the petitioner cannot contend that because a paltry amount was deposited under protest prior to the assessment and at the time of investigation, that be adjusted against the pre-deposit contemplated by section 26(6A) of as compliance with subsection (6A) of section 26 of the MVAT Act.</description>
      <category>Highlights</category>
      <law>VAT and Sales Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 13 Nov 2019 10:06:27 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=50178</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>