https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=388303 The court directed the petitioner to file an appeal against the Ext.P6 assessment order for the assessment year 2012-2013 within three weeks. Recovery steps were to be put on hold pending the appeal decision. For the assessment years 2013-2016, the court allowed the petitioner to revise returns after issuing pre-assessment notices, emphasizing the importance of facilitating honest assesses to correct errors without undue hostility. The court rejected the challenge against Ext.P6 assessment order and permitted the petitioner to revise returns for subsequent assessment years, ensuring procedural fairness in tax assessments. en-us Wed, 16 Oct 2019 00:00:00 +0530 Wed, 13 Nov 2019 10:06:25 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=388303 The court directed the petitioner to file an appeal against the Ext.P6 assessment order for the assessment year 2012-2013 within three weeks. Recovery steps were to be put on hold pending the appeal decision. For the assessment years 2013-2016, the court allowed the petitioner to revise returns after issuing pre-assessment notices, emphasizing the importance of facilitating honest assesses to correct errors without undue hostility. The court rejected the challenge against Ext.P6 assessment order and permitted the petitioner to revise returns for subsequent assessment years, ensuring procedural fairness in tax assessments. Case-Laws VAT and Sales Tax Wed, 16 Oct 2019 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=388303