<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2019 (11) TMI 550 - Supreme Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=388301</link>
    <description>SC reversed lower courts&#039; dismissal of cheque dishonor complaint under Section 138 of Negotiable Instruments Act. Respondent failed to rebut statutory presumption under Sections 118(a) and 139 regarding consideration for cheque issuance. Trial Court and HC erred by dismissing complaint based on discrepancies in amount determination despite written documentation crystallizing dues. Court held presumption established that cheque was drawn for existing debt discharge. Respondent found guilty, ordered to pay fine of Rs. 10,77,712 (twice cheque amount) plus Rs. 1,00,000 litigation costs within three months. Appeal allowed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 17 Oct 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 16 Jul 2025 12:45:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=593922" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2019 (11) TMI 550 - Supreme Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=388301</link>
      <description>SC reversed lower courts&#039; dismissal of cheque dishonor complaint under Section 138 of Negotiable Instruments Act. Respondent failed to rebut statutory presumption under Sections 118(a) and 139 regarding consideration for cheque issuance. Trial Court and HC erred by dismissing complaint based on discrepancies in amount determination despite written documentation crystallizing dues. Court held presumption established that cheque was drawn for existing debt discharge. Respondent found guilty, ordered to pay fine of Rs. 10,77,712 (twice cheque amount) plus Rs. 1,00,000 litigation costs within three months. Appeal allowed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 17 Oct 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=388301</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>