<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1993 (4) TMI 31 - BOMBAY High Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=20393</link>
    <description>The court held that unabsorbed depreciation takes priority over unabsorbed development rebate for set off against profits. The assessee was denied depreciation on acquiring technical data but allowed depreciation on purchasing know-how. The issue of payment for know-how as revenue expenditure was not addressed due to the previous ruling.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 02 Apr 1993 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 13 Nov 2009 16:36:25 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=59392" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1993 (4) TMI 31 - BOMBAY High Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=20393</link>
      <description>The court held that unabsorbed depreciation takes priority over unabsorbed development rebate for set off against profits. The assessee was denied depreciation on acquiring technical data but allowed depreciation on purchasing know-how. The issue of payment for know-how as revenue expenditure was not addressed due to the previous ruling.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 02 Apr 1993 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=20393</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>