<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2019 (11) TMI 542 - CESTAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=388293</link>
    <description>The tribunal ruled in favor of the appellant, holding that the Anti-Dumping Duty applied only to &#039;saccharin&#039; and not to &#039;salt&#039; of saccharin. The decision was based on the specific wording of the notification and the interpretation of relevant legal precedents. The appeal was allowed with consequential relief, if any, granted to the appellant.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 03 May 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 13 Nov 2019 09:45:14 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=593912" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2019 (11) TMI 542 - CESTAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=388293</link>
      <description>The tribunal ruled in favor of the appellant, holding that the Anti-Dumping Duty applied only to &#039;saccharin&#039; and not to &#039;salt&#039; of saccharin. The decision was based on the specific wording of the notification and the interpretation of relevant legal precedents. The appeal was allowed with consequential relief, if any, granted to the appellant.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 03 May 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=388293</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>