<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2019 (11) TMI 537 - CESTAT CHANDIGARH</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=388288</link>
    <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeals filed by the appellant, setting aside the impugned orders and providing consequential relief. The judgment emphasized the importance of considering evidence of export, recognizing essential input services for export, and not dismissing refund claims based on technical invoice issues when service availing was established.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 16 Oct 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 13 Nov 2019 09:31:54 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=593905" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2019 (11) TMI 537 - CESTAT CHANDIGARH</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=388288</link>
      <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeals filed by the appellant, setting aside the impugned orders and providing consequential relief. The judgment emphasized the importance of considering evidence of export, recognizing essential input services for export, and not dismissing refund claims based on technical invoice issues when service availing was established.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 16 Oct 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=388288</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>