https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=284334 The Tribunal held that the acquisition of the urban agricultural land was compulsory, as procedures under the Land Acquisition Act were followed, entitling the assessee to benefit under section 10(37) of the Income Tax Act. The Revenue's appeal was dismissed, and the assessee's Cross Objection was also rejected. The Tribunal's decision in favor of the assessee was upheld on February 5, 2019. en-us Tue, 05 Feb 2019 00:00:00 +0530 Tue, 12 Nov 2019 17:48:24 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=284334 The Tribunal held that the acquisition of the urban agricultural land was compulsory, as procedures under the Land Acquisition Act were followed, entitling the assessee to benefit under section 10(37) of the Income Tax Act. The Revenue's appeal was dismissed, and the assessee's Cross Objection was also rejected. The Tribunal's decision in favor of the assessee was upheld on February 5, 2019. Case-Laws Income Tax Tue, 05 Feb 2019 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=284334