<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2012 (3) TMI 642 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=284327</link>
    <description>The ITAT allowed the appeal, deleting the addition made by the Assessing Officer for income from house property. The ITAT applied the order from the Assessment Year 1996-97, as there were no material changes in facts or law provisions, and the municipal valuation remained consistent. The appellant&#039;s argument was accepted, resulting in the Assessing Officer&#039;s estimation being overturned, and the appellant&#039;s declared income being accepted.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 20 Mar 2012 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 12 Nov 2019 15:55:16 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=593867" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2012 (3) TMI 642 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=284327</link>
      <description>The ITAT allowed the appeal, deleting the addition made by the Assessing Officer for income from house property. The ITAT applied the order from the Assessment Year 1996-97, as there were no material changes in facts or law provisions, and the municipal valuation remained consistent. The appellant&#039;s argument was accepted, resulting in the Assessing Officer&#039;s estimation being overturned, and the appellant&#039;s declared income being accepted.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 20 Mar 2012 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=284327</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>