<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2019 (11) TMI 513 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=388264</link>
    <description>The Appellate Tribunal allowed the appeal, ruling that importing diamonds for re-export constituted a service eligible for deduction under Section 10AA of the Income Tax Act. The Tribunal held that trading activities fell within the definition of &#039;services&#039; under the SEZ Act, overriding the Assessing Officer&#039;s emphasis on manufacturing. As the assessee met the statutory conditions, the Tribunal directed the allowance of the deduction, citing precedents and statutory interpretation to support its decision.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 30 Oct 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 12 Nov 2019 12:24:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=593825" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2019 (11) TMI 513 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=388264</link>
      <description>The Appellate Tribunal allowed the appeal, ruling that importing diamonds for re-export constituted a service eligible for deduction under Section 10AA of the Income Tax Act. The Tribunal held that trading activities fell within the definition of &#039;services&#039; under the SEZ Act, overriding the Assessing Officer&#039;s emphasis on manufacturing. As the assessee met the statutory conditions, the Tribunal directed the allowance of the deduction, citing precedents and statutory interpretation to support its decision.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 30 Oct 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=388264</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>