<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2019 (11) TMI 495 - CESTAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=388246</link>
    <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeal and set aside the penalty imposed by the Commissioner (Appeals) on the appellant for renting immovable property services. The decision was based on legal provisions and judicial precedent, emphasizing the complexities of taxation in such cases. The Tribunal highlighted the importance of statutory provisions and reasonable cause for non-payment of service tax, ultimately ruling in favor of the appellant and overturning the penalty.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 24 Sep 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 12 Nov 2019 06:46:48 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=593793" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2019 (11) TMI 495 - CESTAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=388246</link>
      <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeal and set aside the penalty imposed by the Commissioner (Appeals) on the appellant for renting immovable property services. The decision was based on legal provisions and judicial precedent, emphasizing the complexities of taxation in such cases. The Tribunal highlighted the importance of statutory provisions and reasonable cause for non-payment of service tax, ultimately ruling in favor of the appellant and overturning the penalty.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 24 Sep 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=388246</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>