https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=388241 The tribunal allowed the appeal, granting the appellant entitlement to Cenvat credit for services used in the Visakhapatnam unit. It held that since no credit was claimed for these services in the Hyderabad unit, the appellant could avail the credit for the Visakhapatnam unit despite challans mentioning details of the Hyderabad unit. The tribunal emphasized substantial compliance with Rule 9(1)(e) of CCR 2004, setting aside the previous order and providing relief to the appellant. en-us Fri, 08 Nov 2019 00:00:00 +0530 Tue, 12 Nov 2019 06:39:26 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=388241 The tribunal allowed the appeal, granting the appellant entitlement to Cenvat credit for services used in the Visakhapatnam unit. It held that since no credit was claimed for these services in the Hyderabad unit, the appellant could avail the credit for the Visakhapatnam unit despite challans mentioning details of the Hyderabad unit. The tribunal emphasized substantial compliance with Rule 9(1)(e) of CCR 2004, setting aside the previous order and providing relief to the appellant. Case-Laws Central Excise Fri, 08 Nov 2019 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=388241