https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=388233 The appeal was dismissed by the Appellate Tribunal CESTAT New Delhi due to the Appellant's consistent lack of participation and interest in pursuing the case, despite repeated requests and warnings. The Member cited a Supreme Court case emphasizing the importance of active engagement in legal proceedings and ruled that non-appearance without reasonable cause warranted dismissal for want of prosecution. The decision was final, with no possibility of restoration, aligning with the principles outlined in the Supreme Court precedent regarding the dismissal of appeals for non-prosecution. en-us Tue, 15 Oct 2019 00:00:00 +0530 Tue, 12 Nov 2019 06:31:34 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=388233 The appeal was dismissed by the Appellate Tribunal CESTAT New Delhi due to the Appellant's consistent lack of participation and interest in pursuing the case, despite repeated requests and warnings. The Member cited a Supreme Court case emphasizing the importance of active engagement in legal proceedings and ruled that non-appearance without reasonable cause warranted dismissal for want of prosecution. The decision was final, with no possibility of restoration, aligning with the principles outlined in the Supreme Court precedent regarding the dismissal of appeals for non-prosecution. Case-Laws Central Excise Tue, 15 Oct 2019 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=388233