<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2018 (3) TMI 1820 - BOMBAY HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=284306</link>
    <description>The HC dismissed three Notices of Motion seeking condonation of a 286-day delay in setting aside a self-operating order dated 12th January 2016. The court found the affidavits supporting the motions insufficient, lacking detailed explanations for the delay. The judgment criticized the Revenue Department&#039;s negligence in managing legal cases and emphasized the necessity for diligence and responsibility, especially in matters with substantial financial implications. The court denied leniency due to the lack of satisfactory explanations, highlighting the importance of prompt and thorough legal action. No costs were imposed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 15 Mar 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 28 Feb 2024 12:52:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=593740" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2018 (3) TMI 1820 - BOMBAY HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=284306</link>
      <description>The HC dismissed three Notices of Motion seeking condonation of a 286-day delay in setting aside a self-operating order dated 12th January 2016. The court found the affidavits supporting the motions insufficient, lacking detailed explanations for the delay. The judgment criticized the Revenue Department&#039;s negligence in managing legal cases and emphasized the necessity for diligence and responsibility, especially in matters with substantial financial implications. The court denied leniency due to the lack of satisfactory explanations, highlighting the importance of prompt and thorough legal action. No costs were imposed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 15 Mar 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=284306</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>