<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2019 (11) TMI 474 - KERALA HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=388225</link>
    <description>The High Court quashed Ext.P1 and P4 orders for detention and confiscation of goods under the KGST Act. The Court found the grounds for detention insufficient under Section 129 and lacking essential elements for confiscation under Section 130. The petitioner&#039;s challenge was successful, leading to the release of goods and the vehicle, with the possibility of penal action by the respondents following GST Act procedures.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 08 Nov 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 30 Jan 2020 18:14:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=593705" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2019 (11) TMI 474 - KERALA HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=388225</link>
      <description>The High Court quashed Ext.P1 and P4 orders for detention and confiscation of goods under the KGST Act. The Court found the grounds for detention insufficient under Section 129 and lacking essential elements for confiscation under Section 130. The petitioner&#039;s challenge was successful, leading to the release of goods and the vehicle, with the possibility of penal action by the respondents following GST Act procedures.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>GST</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 08 Nov 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=388225</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>