https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=388224 The court allowed the writ petition, directing the 1st respondent to release the goods and consignment to the petitioner as there was no indication of transportation contrary to the e-Way Bill. The judgment emphasized that detaining goods should not be automatic solely based on the driver choosing a different route, without evidence of deviation from the specified destination in the e-Way Bill. en-us Fri, 08 Nov 2019 00:00:00 +0530 Thu, 30 Jan 2020 18:11:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=388224 The court allowed the writ petition, directing the 1st respondent to release the goods and consignment to the petitioner as there was no indication of transportation contrary to the e-Way Bill. The judgment emphasized that detaining goods should not be automatic solely based on the driver choosing a different route, without evidence of deviation from the specified destination in the e-Way Bill. Case-Laws GST Fri, 08 Nov 2019 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=388224