<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2019 (11) TMI 464 - BOMBAY HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=388215</link>
    <description>The Court dismissed the Appeal, emphasizing that re-opening the assessment on the same grounds amounts to a change of opinion and is without jurisdiction, as there was no fresh tangible material to justify such action. The Tribunal&#039;s decision was upheld, highlighting the importance of proper consideration by the Assessing Officer and the need for valid reasons beyond mere audit objections to re-open assessments.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 04 Nov 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 19 Aug 2020 15:24:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=593693" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2019 (11) TMI 464 - BOMBAY HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=388215</link>
      <description>The Court dismissed the Appeal, emphasizing that re-opening the assessment on the same grounds amounts to a change of opinion and is without jurisdiction, as there was no fresh tangible material to justify such action. The Tribunal&#039;s decision was upheld, highlighting the importance of proper consideration by the Assessing Officer and the need for valid reasons beyond mere audit objections to re-open assessments.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 04 Nov 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=388215</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>