<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2019 (11) TMI 463 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=388214</link>
    <description>The court allowed the writ petition, setting aside the respondent&#039;s order rejecting condonation of delay in filing the income tax return and refund application. The court emphasized the importance of considering substantive justice over technicalities, remanding the matter for fresh evaluation to ensure the petitioner&#039;s claim receives due consideration based on its merits within a specified timeframe.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 01 Oct 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 11 Nov 2019 09:31:41 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=593691" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2019 (11) TMI 463 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=388214</link>
      <description>The court allowed the writ petition, setting aside the respondent&#039;s order rejecting condonation of delay in filing the income tax return and refund application. The court emphasized the importance of considering substantive justice over technicalities, remanding the matter for fresh evaluation to ensure the petitioner&#039;s claim receives due consideration based on its merits within a specified timeframe.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 01 Oct 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=388214</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>