<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2019 (11) TMI 451 - CESTAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=388202</link>
    <description>The Tribunal upheld the classification of the imported antenna under CSH 85177090 as &quot;parts&quot; of a base station and confirmed the Respondents&#039; eligibility for exemption under Notification No.25/2005-Cus. It found no violation of principles of natural justice and held that the appeal was maintainable despite duty being paid under protest. As a result, the Revenue&#039;s appeals were dismissed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 06 Nov 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 27 Feb 2020 11:51:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=593672" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2019 (11) TMI 451 - CESTAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=388202</link>
      <description>The Tribunal upheld the classification of the imported antenna under CSH 85177090 as &quot;parts&quot; of a base station and confirmed the Respondents&#039; eligibility for exemption under Notification No.25/2005-Cus. It found no violation of principles of natural justice and held that the appeal was maintainable despite duty being paid under protest. As a result, the Revenue&#039;s appeals were dismissed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 06 Nov 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=388202</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>