<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2019 (11) TMI 449 - Supreme Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=388200</link>
    <description>The Supreme Court overturned NCLAT&#039;s decision modifying a resolution plan due to alleged discrimination against financial creditors. The Court held that the plan, approved before the amendment to Regulation 38, did not violate Section 30 of the IBC. The appellant&#039;s offer exceeded liquidation value, and the plan had been implemented, leading to the restoration of NCLT&#039;s decision. The appeal succeeded, with no costs awarded.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 08 Nov 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 08 Nov 2019 18:35:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=593670" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2019 (11) TMI 449 - Supreme Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=388200</link>
      <description>The Supreme Court overturned NCLAT&#039;s decision modifying a resolution plan due to alleged discrimination against financial creditors. The Court held that the plan, approved before the amendment to Regulation 38, did not violate Section 30 of the IBC. The appellant&#039;s offer exceeded liquidation value, and the plan had been implemented, leading to the restoration of NCLT&#039;s decision. The appeal succeeded, with no costs awarded.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Insolvency and Bankruptcy</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 08 Nov 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=388200</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>