<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2019 (11) TMI 440 - CESTAT BANGALORE</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=388191</link>
    <description>The Tribunal upheld the demand of interest under Section 75 of the Finance Act, 1994, for the period in question and remanded the matter for quantification of interest. The Tribunal set aside the penalty imposed under Section 78, considering the circumstances and ongoing disputes regarding the taxability of the services. The appellant&#039;s appeal was allowed by way of remand, with the penalty being overturned.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 08 Nov 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 11 Nov 2019 09:29:47 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=593661" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2019 (11) TMI 440 - CESTAT BANGALORE</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=388191</link>
      <description>The Tribunal upheld the demand of interest under Section 75 of the Finance Act, 1994, for the period in question and remanded the matter for quantification of interest. The Tribunal set aside the penalty imposed under Section 78, considering the circumstances and ongoing disputes regarding the taxability of the services. The appellant&#039;s appeal was allowed by way of remand, with the penalty being overturned.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 08 Nov 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=388191</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>