<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2019 (11) TMI 439 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=388190</link>
    <description>The Tribunal upheld the Commissioner (Appeals)&#039; decision to dismiss the appeal on the ground of limitation, citing the lack of sufficient cause for the delay in filing the appeal. The judgment emphasized the statutory limitations on the appellate authority&#039;s power to condone delays beyond the prescribed period.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 07 Nov 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sun, 10 Nov 2019 17:27:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=593660" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2019 (11) TMI 439 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=388190</link>
      <description>The Tribunal upheld the Commissioner (Appeals)&#039; decision to dismiss the appeal on the ground of limitation, citing the lack of sufficient cause for the delay in filing the appeal. The judgment emphasized the statutory limitations on the appellate authority&#039;s power to condone delays beyond the prescribed period.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 07 Nov 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=388190</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>