https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=388187 The Tribunal allowed the appeal, setting aside the Commissioner's order. It held that the appellant did not provide "business auxiliary service" to Career Launcher, was entitled to exemption under the Notification, and that requiring the appellant to pay service tax would result in double taxation. The Tribunal emphasized the importance of consistent treatment of similar cases by the department, ultimately ruling in favor of the appellant. en-us Wed, 17 Jul 2019 00:00:00 +0530 Fri, 04 Mar 2022 14:22:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=388187 The Tribunal allowed the appeal, setting aside the Commissioner's order. It held that the appellant did not provide "business auxiliary service" to Career Launcher, was entitled to exemption under the Notification, and that requiring the appellant to pay service tax would result in double taxation. The Tribunal emphasized the importance of consistent treatment of similar cases by the department, ultimately ruling in favor of the appellant. Case-Laws Service Tax Wed, 17 Jul 2019 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=388187