https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=388182 The Tribunal upheld the Commissioner (Appeals)' decision, dismissing the Revenue's appeal and affirming the continuation of Central Excise Registration for the respondent/assessee. The Tribunal found the revocation unjustified, emphasizing the respondent's lawful possession of the premises and compliance with registration requirements. The respondent was entitled to consequential benefits, with the Tribunal highlighting the importance of adherence to Central Excise Rules for registration validity. en-us Thu, 07 Nov 2019 00:00:00 +0530 Mon, 11 Nov 2019 09:28:51 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=388182 The Tribunal upheld the Commissioner (Appeals)' decision, dismissing the Revenue's appeal and affirming the continuation of Central Excise Registration for the respondent/assessee. The Tribunal found the revocation unjustified, emphasizing the respondent's lawful possession of the premises and compliance with registration requirements. The respondent was entitled to consequential benefits, with the Tribunal highlighting the importance of adherence to Central Excise Rules for registration validity. Case-Laws Central Excise Thu, 07 Nov 2019 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=388182