<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2018 (11) TMI 1709 - NATIONAL COMPANY LAW TRIBUNAL, BENGALURU</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=284282</link>
    <description>The tribunal rejected the petition under Section 9 of the IBC due to the existence of a genuine dispute regarding the amount due, failure to prove the debt was undisputed, and filing beyond the limitation period. The rejection was based on the nature of the proceedings as recovery rather than insolvency resolution. The petitioner was not precluded from seeking other legal remedies, and no costs were awarded.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 08 Nov 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sun, 10 Nov 2019 15:17:49 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=593627" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2018 (11) TMI 1709 - NATIONAL COMPANY LAW TRIBUNAL, BENGALURU</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=284282</link>
      <description>The tribunal rejected the petition under Section 9 of the IBC due to the existence of a genuine dispute regarding the amount due, failure to prove the debt was undisputed, and filing beyond the limitation period. The rejection was based on the nature of the proceedings as recovery rather than insolvency resolution. The petitioner was not precluded from seeking other legal remedies, and no costs were awarded.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Insolvency and Bankruptcy</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 08 Nov 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=284282</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>