https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=388170 A secured creditor and receiver challenged detention of a mortgaged vehicle moved for taking physical possession in compliance with a DRT order, contending that such movement was not "supply" under the GST regime. At hearing, the petitioners sought leave to withdraw the writ petition so they could challenge a subsequent order passed under the HGST Act. The High Court dismissed the petition as withdrawn and granted the requested liberty to pursue that later challenge. en-us Tue, 05 Nov 2019 00:00:00 +0530 Thu, 13 Mar 2025 10:06:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=388170 A secured creditor and receiver challenged detention of a mortgaged vehicle moved for taking physical possession in compliance with a DRT order, contending that such movement was not "supply" under the GST regime. At hearing, the petitioners sought leave to withdraw the writ petition so they could challenge a subsequent order passed under the HGST Act. The High Court dismissed the petition as withdrawn and granted the requested liberty to pursue that later challenge. Case-Laws GST Tue, 05 Nov 2019 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=388170