https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=284279 The Court ruled that appointments made by the State of U.P. in violation of constitutional equality provisions are illegal and void ab initio. Regularization of employees in such cases is meant to cure procedural irregularities and must be initiated promptly. Compliance with constitutional and statutory provisions is crucial, and any policy decision for regularization without proper rules is impermissible. The High Court's errors were highlighted, leading to the appeal being allowed, with respondents to be compensated for delays, and the State authorized to recover from responsible officers. Impugned orders were set aside, and the appeal was allowed without costs. en-us Thu, 23 Nov 2006 00:00:00 +0530 Sat, 09 Nov 2019 12:50:45 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=284279 The Court ruled that appointments made by the State of U.P. in violation of constitutional equality provisions are illegal and void ab initio. Regularization of employees in such cases is meant to cure procedural irregularities and must be initiated promptly. Compliance with constitutional and statutory provisions is crucial, and any policy decision for regularization without proper rules is impermissible. The High Court's errors were highlighted, leading to the appeal being allowed, with respondents to be compensated for delays, and the State authorized to recover from responsible officers. Impugned orders were set aside, and the appeal was allowed without costs. Case-Laws Indian Laws Thu, 23 Nov 2006 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=284279