<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2007 (4) TMI 759 - Supreme Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=284277</link>
    <description>The Supreme Court held that policy decisions cannot override statutory rules or constitutional provisions. It emphasized that appointments made in violation of the law are null and void. The Court set aside the High Court&#039;s judgment, stating that illegality cannot be perpetuated, and equality cannot exist in illegality. The appeal was allowed with no order as to costs.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 26 Apr 2007 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 09 Nov 2019 12:12:22 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=593604" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2007 (4) TMI 759 - Supreme Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=284277</link>
      <description>The Supreme Court held that policy decisions cannot override statutory rules or constitutional provisions. It emphasized that appointments made in violation of the law are null and void. The Court set aside the High Court&#039;s judgment, stating that illegality cannot be perpetuated, and equality cannot exist in illegality. The appeal was allowed with no order as to costs.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 26 Apr 2007 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=284277</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>