https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=284274 The High Court held that the respondent was entitled to the benefits of the regularization scheme formulated by the State of Punjab. However, the circular letter extending the scheme to autonomous bodies was deemed invalid. The court clarified that the scheme did not apply to contract employees and could only regularize irregular appointments, not illegal ones. The appellant was directed to reconsider the termination of services in light of the scheme. Ultimately, the appeal was allowed, setting aside the judgment with no costs awarded. en-us Tue, 20 Feb 2007 00:00:00 +0530 Sat, 09 Nov 2019 11:46:30 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=284274 The High Court held that the respondent was entitled to the benefits of the regularization scheme formulated by the State of Punjab. However, the circular letter extending the scheme to autonomous bodies was deemed invalid. The court clarified that the scheme did not apply to contract employees and could only regularize irregular appointments, not illegal ones. The appellant was directed to reconsider the termination of services in light of the scheme. Ultimately, the appeal was allowed, setting aside the judgment with no costs awarded. Case-Laws Indian Laws Tue, 20 Feb 2007 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=284274