https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=284269 The appeal was dismissed as the Adjudicating Authority lacked jurisdiction to recall the order under Section 9 of the I&B Code. The Appellant's claim of fraudulent initiation of Corporate Insolvency Resolution Process was rejected, and their status as an investor did not entitle them to challenge the order. The Appellate Tribunal upheld the decision, stating any challenge to the admission order would be time-barred. The Appellant was advised to file a claim before the Insolvency Resolution Professional, and the Adjudicating Authority's orders were affirmed. en-us Thu, 30 Nov 2017 00:00:00 +0530 Sat, 09 Nov 2019 06:27:36 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=284269 The appeal was dismissed as the Adjudicating Authority lacked jurisdiction to recall the order under Section 9 of the I&B Code. The Appellant's claim of fraudulent initiation of Corporate Insolvency Resolution Process was rejected, and their status as an investor did not entitle them to challenge the order. The Appellate Tribunal upheld the decision, stating any challenge to the admission order would be time-barred. The Appellant was advised to file a claim before the Insolvency Resolution Professional, and the Adjudicating Authority's orders were affirmed. Case-Laws Insolvency and Bankruptcy Thu, 30 Nov 2017 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=284269