https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=388165 The appeal under Section 35G of the Central Excise Act, 1944, challenging the CESTAT order was allowed, setting aside the Order-in-Original against the respondent Company accused of clandestine clearances. CESTAT granted relief, but an application to withdraw the appeal based on revised monetary limits was filed, citing penalties below the threshold. The appeal was dismissed as withdrawn, emphasizing legal complexities of clandestine clearances, appeal procedures, and the impact of revised monetary limits on the case. en-us Sun, 20 Oct 2019 00:00:00 +0530 Fri, 08 Nov 2019 10:11:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=388165 The appeal under Section 35G of the Central Excise Act, 1944, challenging the CESTAT order was allowed, setting aside the Order-in-Original against the respondent Company accused of clandestine clearances. CESTAT granted relief, but an application to withdraw the appeal based on revised monetary limits was filed, citing penalties below the threshold. The appeal was dismissed as withdrawn, emphasizing legal complexities of clandestine clearances, appeal procedures, and the impact of revised monetary limits on the case. Case-Laws Central Excise Sun, 20 Oct 2019 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=388165