<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1992 (9) TMI 24 - CALCUTTA High Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=20358</link>
    <description>The High Court of Calcutta ruled against allowing royalty as a business expenditure for the assessment year 1972-73. The Court held that the liability for royalty payment could only be claimed as a business expenditure in the subsequent year. However, the Court agreed with the Tribunal on the assessment of interest on fixed deposits, stating that it should be treated as business income under the head &#039;Profits and gains of business or profession&#039;.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 14 Sep 1992 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 13 Nov 2009 15:11:24 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=59357" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1992 (9) TMI 24 - CALCUTTA High Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=20358</link>
      <description>The High Court of Calcutta ruled against allowing royalty as a business expenditure for the assessment year 1972-73. The Court held that the liability for royalty payment could only be claimed as a business expenditure in the subsequent year. However, the Court agreed with the Tribunal on the assessment of interest on fixed deposits, stating that it should be treated as business income under the head &#039;Profits and gains of business or profession&#039;.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 14 Sep 1992 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=20358</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>