<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2019 (11) TMI 401 - ITAT JAIPUR</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=388152</link>
    <description>The Tribunal allowed both appeals of the assessee, deleting the additions and enhancements made by the assessing officer and CIT (A). It ruled that the interest earned on Fixed Deposit Receipts should be treated as business income and deleted the penalty under section 271(1)(c) as it did not survive following the deletion of income enhancements.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 30 Jul 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 08 Nov 2019 08:50:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=593555" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2019 (11) TMI 401 - ITAT JAIPUR</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=388152</link>
      <description>The Tribunal allowed both appeals of the assessee, deleting the additions and enhancements made by the assessing officer and CIT (A). It ruled that the interest earned on Fixed Deposit Receipts should be treated as business income and deleted the penalty under section 271(1)(c) as it did not survive following the deletion of income enhancements.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 30 Jul 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=388152</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>