<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1969 (7) TMI 120 - THE HOUSE OF LORDS</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=284260</link>
    <description>A limited preliminary screening under section 28(5) of the Finance Act 1960 required the tribunal only to decide whether a prima facie case existed on the statutory documents. The statutory declaration by the taxpayer and the commissioners&#039; counter-statement were part of that confined process, but natural justice did not require automatic disclosure of the counter-statement or a further opportunity to reply before the prima facie decision. The scheme, read as a whole, was treated as fair because Parliament specified the materials to be considered at that stage, while leaving only a residual exceptional power to act where fairness demanded it.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 29 Jul 1969 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 08 Nov 2019 12:34:03 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=593526" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1969 (7) TMI 120 - THE HOUSE OF LORDS</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=284260</link>
      <description>A limited preliminary screening under section 28(5) of the Finance Act 1960 required the tribunal only to decide whether a prima facie case existed on the statutory documents. The statutory declaration by the taxpayer and the commissioners&#039; counter-statement were part of that confined process, but natural justice did not require automatic disclosure of the counter-statement or a further opportunity to reply before the prima facie decision. The scheme, read as a whole, was treated as fair because Parliament specified the materials to be considered at that stage, while leaving only a residual exceptional power to act where fairness demanded it.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 29 Jul 1969 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=284260</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>