<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2019 (11) TMI 394 - ITAT JAIPUR</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=388145</link>
    <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeal, ruling that the penalty under section 271(1)(c) of the IT Act for AY 2014-15 was unjustified. The surrender of income by the company was deemed reasonable and bonafide, supported by genuine commission payments with proper documentation. As no incriminating material was found during the survey, the penalty was deleted based on the genuineness of the claim and the absence of justification for the penalty.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 22 Oct 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 08 Nov 2019 10:29:20 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=593495" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2019 (11) TMI 394 - ITAT JAIPUR</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=388145</link>
      <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeal, ruling that the penalty under section 271(1)(c) of the IT Act for AY 2014-15 was unjustified. The surrender of income by the company was deemed reasonable and bonafide, supported by genuine commission payments with proper documentation. As no incriminating material was found during the survey, the penalty was deleted based on the genuineness of the claim and the absence of justification for the penalty.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 22 Oct 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=388145</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>