<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1992 (8) TMI 12 - MADRAS High Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=20350</link>
    <description>The court allowed the tax revision for the rubber replanting subsidy and granted a 50% deduction for the maintenance of Bharat Medical Centre. However, the claim for car maintenance expenses was dismissed due to insufficient evidence supporting the full deduction. No costs were awarded in this case.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 18 Aug 1992 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 13 Nov 2009 13:54:54 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=59349" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1992 (8) TMI 12 - MADRAS High Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=20350</link>
      <description>The court allowed the tax revision for the rubber replanting subsidy and granted a 50% deduction for the maintenance of Bharat Medical Centre. However, the claim for car maintenance expenses was dismissed due to insufficient evidence supporting the full deduction. No costs were awarded in this case.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 18 Aug 1992 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=20350</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>