<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2019 (11) TMI 386 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=388137</link>
    <description>Deputation of employees to subsidiary companies on reimbursement of actual salary and administrative expenses was not Business Support Service under section 65(105)(zzzq) of the Finance Act, 1994. The arrangement was treated as a manpower supply or deputation model, not a service of business or commerce support, because mere recovery of establishment costs did not satisfy the statutory description of Business Support Service. The Board&#039;s clarification on deputation of staff, which placed such arrangements within manpower recruitment or supply agency service, was binding on departmental authorities and had to be followed for classification.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 07 Nov 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 18 Nov 2020 15:18:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=593483" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2019 (11) TMI 386 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=388137</link>
      <description>Deputation of employees to subsidiary companies on reimbursement of actual salary and administrative expenses was not Business Support Service under section 65(105)(zzzq) of the Finance Act, 1994. The arrangement was treated as a manpower supply or deputation model, not a service of business or commerce support, because mere recovery of establishment costs did not satisfy the statutory description of Business Support Service. The Board&#039;s clarification on deputation of staff, which placed such arrangements within manpower recruitment or supply agency service, was binding on departmental authorities and had to be followed for classification.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 07 Nov 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=388137</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>