https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=388134 The Tribunal ruled in favor of the appellant, setting aside the demand under Commercial or Industrial Construction Services (CICS) for both periods and rejecting the invocation of the extended period for demand raised. The judgment emphasized the importance of proving the composite nature of contracts and the lack of intentional suppression of facts in tax-related issues. en-us Tue, 22 Oct 2019 00:00:00 +0530 Fri, 08 Nov 2019 10:15:32 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=388134 The Tribunal ruled in favor of the appellant, setting aside the demand under Commercial or Industrial Construction Services (CICS) for both periods and rejecting the invocation of the extended period for demand raised. The judgment emphasized the importance of proving the composite nature of contracts and the lack of intentional suppression of facts in tax-related issues. Case-Laws Service Tax Tue, 22 Oct 2019 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=388134