<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2019 (11) TMI 381 - CESTAT HYDERABAD</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=388132</link>
    <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeal, emphasizing the absence of provisions in the CENVAT Credit Rules to partially disallow credit on the same invoice. The decision highlighted the need for clarity in cases involving shared usage of services and upheld the appellant&#039;s argument for full credit, overturning the lower authorities&#039; decisions and emphasizing fairness principles in interpreting the rules.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 18 Oct 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 18 Nov 2020 15:17:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=593476" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2019 (11) TMI 381 - CESTAT HYDERABAD</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=388132</link>
      <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeal, emphasizing the absence of provisions in the CENVAT Credit Rules to partially disallow credit on the same invoice. The decision highlighted the need for clarity in cases involving shared usage of services and upheld the appellant&#039;s argument for full credit, overturning the lower authorities&#039; decisions and emphasizing fairness principles in interpreting the rules.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 18 Oct 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=388132</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>