<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2019 (11) TMI 371 - Supreme Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=388122</link>
    <description>In a Section 11 petition, the Court accepted the parties&#039; consent to depart from a contractual three-member tribunal and appointed a sole arbitrator. The appointment was made subject to Section 12 disclosures on independence and impartiality, with directions that the reference be completed within the prescribed time. The arbitration was to be conducted at New Delhi in line with the contractual seat clause, and the arbitrator&#039;s fees were made subject to the Fourth Schedule.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 07 Nov 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 08 Nov 2019 09:47:28 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=593463" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2019 (11) TMI 371 - Supreme Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=388122</link>
      <description>In a Section 11 petition, the Court accepted the parties&#039; consent to depart from a contractual three-member tribunal and appointed a sole arbitrator. The appointment was made subject to Section 12 disclosures on independence and impartiality, with directions that the reference be completed within the prescribed time. The arbitration was to be conducted at New Delhi in line with the contractual seat clause, and the arbitrator&#039;s fees were made subject to the Fourth Schedule.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 07 Nov 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=388122</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>