<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2019 (11) TMI 362 - ITAT PUNE</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=388113</link>
    <description>ITAT Pune held that excess sugarcane price could not be added without first separating the deductible minimum price from any profit element embedded in the additional price fixed under the control order; the matter was remanded for fresh examination of the accounts and supporting material. It further held that concessional sale of sugar to members was not appropriation of profit merely because the realisation was below market price; taxability depended on whether the sale price fell below the assessee&#039;s true cost price, which had to be computed on a direct and indirect cost basis before any addition could be made. Both additions were therefore set aside and sent back for recomputation.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 05 Nov 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 07 Nov 2019 16:20:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=593448" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2019 (11) TMI 362 - ITAT PUNE</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=388113</link>
      <description>ITAT Pune held that excess sugarcane price could not be added without first separating the deductible minimum price from any profit element embedded in the additional price fixed under the control order; the matter was remanded for fresh examination of the accounts and supporting material. It further held that concessional sale of sugar to members was not appropriation of profit merely because the realisation was below market price; taxability depended on whether the sale price fell below the assessee&#039;s true cost price, which had to be computed on a direct and indirect cost basis before any addition could be made. Both additions were therefore set aside and sent back for recomputation.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 05 Nov 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=388113</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>