https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=284247 The Court upheld the decision to procure 36 Rafale aircrafts, emphasizing limited judicial scrutiny in defense procurement matters. It found the decision-making process followed, justified the change from 126 to 36 aircrafts, and declined to intervene in pricing details citing confidentiality and commercial advantage. The Court ruled that the choice of Indian Offset Partner was the vendor's prerogative, dismissing allegations of favoritism. It concluded that judicial review parameters were not breached, dismissing all writ petitions concerning the Rafale deal. en-us Fri, 14 Dec 2018 00:00:00 +0530 Wed, 03 Aug 2022 17:21:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=284247 The Court upheld the decision to procure 36 Rafale aircrafts, emphasizing limited judicial scrutiny in defense procurement matters. It found the decision-making process followed, justified the change from 126 to 36 aircrafts, and declined to intervene in pricing details citing confidentiality and commercial advantage. The Court ruled that the choice of Indian Offset Partner was the vendor's prerogative, dismissing allegations of favoritism. It concluded that judicial review parameters were not breached, dismissing all writ petitions concerning the Rafale deal. Case-Laws Indian Laws Fri, 14 Dec 2018 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=284247