<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2008 (1) TMI 983 - Supreme Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=284228</link>
    <description>A licence to drive a light motor vehicle, as understood under the statutory scheme then in force, authorised driving of a light goods carriage or transport vehicle within the prescribed weight limit. The later substitution of transport vehicle in the licence forms operated prospectively and did not retrospectively invalidate an existing licence. On that basis, the driver was treated as duly authorised to drive the offending vehicle, and the insurer could not avoid liability by alleging absence of proper authorisation.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 22 Jan 2008 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 07 Nov 2019 16:10:15 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=593389" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2008 (1) TMI 983 - Supreme Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=284228</link>
      <description>A licence to drive a light motor vehicle, as understood under the statutory scheme then in force, authorised driving of a light goods carriage or transport vehicle within the prescribed weight limit. The later substitution of transport vehicle in the licence forms operated prospectively and did not retrospectively invalidate an existing licence. On that basis, the driver was treated as duly authorised to drive the offending vehicle, and the insurer could not avoid liability by alleging absence of proper authorisation.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 22 Jan 2008 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=284228</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>