https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=284226 Where a special anti-corruption statute is silent on confiscation, the general provisions of the Code of Criminal Procedure apply in full force under Section 4(2), so a criminal court may order confiscation after trial under Section 452. The Special Judge therefore had jurisdiction to confiscate property seized from the accused, and the order was upheld because the confiscated property formed the basis of the conviction and no lack of application of mind was shown. The confiscation order was valid, and the appeal failed. en-us Wed, 10 Nov 1982 00:00:00 +0530 Thu, 07 Nov 2019 15:36:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=284226 Where a special anti-corruption statute is silent on confiscation, the general provisions of the Code of Criminal Procedure apply in full force under Section 4(2), so a criminal court may order confiscation after trial under Section 452. The Special Judge therefore had jurisdiction to confiscate property seized from the accused, and the order was upheld because the confiscated property formed the basis of the conviction and no lack of application of mind was shown. The confiscation order was valid, and the appeal failed. Case-Laws Indian Laws Wed, 10 Nov 1982 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=284226