<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2018 (12) TMI 1715 - KARNATAKA HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=284216</link>
    <description>The High Court allowed depreciation on the valuation of the investment portfolio, treating the investments as stock-in-trade, following a precedent set in a previous case. The Court ruled in favor of the assessee, citing consistency with earlier decisions. The Court also determined that the Tribunal&#039;s order was not perverse, as it aligned with the judgment in a related case, leading to the dismissal of the writ petition.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 18 Dec 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 07 Nov 2019 08:44:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=593332" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2018 (12) TMI 1715 - KARNATAKA HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=284216</link>
      <description>The High Court allowed depreciation on the valuation of the investment portfolio, treating the investments as stock-in-trade, following a precedent set in a previous case. The Court ruled in favor of the assessee, citing consistency with earlier decisions. The Court also determined that the Tribunal&#039;s order was not perverse, as it aligned with the judgment in a related case, leading to the dismissal of the writ petition.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 18 Dec 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=284216</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>