<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2019 (11) TMI 345 - ITAT JAIPUR</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=388096</link>
    <description>The Tribunal ruled in favor of the assessee, setting aside the reassessment order due to the invalidity of the reopening of the assessment. The Tribunal emphasized the importance of proper application of mind and correct factual grounds for initiating reassessment proceedings, highlighting the need for adherence to legal requirements in such cases. The trading addition and rejection of books of account issues became irrelevant following the invalidation of the reassessment.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 10 Oct 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 07 Nov 2019 08:22:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=593331" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2019 (11) TMI 345 - ITAT JAIPUR</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=388096</link>
      <description>The Tribunal ruled in favor of the assessee, setting aside the reassessment order due to the invalidity of the reopening of the assessment. The Tribunal emphasized the importance of proper application of mind and correct factual grounds for initiating reassessment proceedings, highlighting the need for adherence to legal requirements in such cases. The trading addition and rejection of books of account issues became irrelevant following the invalidation of the reassessment.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 10 Oct 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=388096</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>