<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2019 (11) TMI 327 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=388078</link>
    <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeal, deleting the penalty levied under section 271AAB, as the expenses were recorded in the books and not found to be false. The admissions made during the search were to avoid litigation, which does not justify the penalty under section 271AAB. The appeal of the assessee was allowed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 30 Oct 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 05 Feb 2020 14:57:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=593309" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2019 (11) TMI 327 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=388078</link>
      <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeal, deleting the penalty levied under section 271AAB, as the expenses were recorded in the books and not found to be false. The admissions made during the search were to avoid litigation, which does not justify the penalty under section 271AAB. The appeal of the assessee was allowed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 30 Oct 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=388078</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>