<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2019 (11) TMI 319 - DELHI HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=388070</link>
    <description>The court upheld the inclusion of petitioners in the list of disqualified directors under Section 164(2) but rejected the applicability of Section 167(1)(a) for disqualifications incurred under Section 164(2) before 07.05.2018. The court directed the reactivation of DIN and DSC of the petitioners and clarified that the petitioners would continue to be liable for penalties under the Act. The petitions were disposed of accordingly.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 04 Nov 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 27 Oct 2020 17:54:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=593297" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2019 (11) TMI 319 - DELHI HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=388070</link>
      <description>The court upheld the inclusion of petitioners in the list of disqualified directors under Section 164(2) but rejected the applicability of Section 167(1)(a) for disqualifications incurred under Section 164(2) before 07.05.2018. The court directed the reactivation of DIN and DSC of the petitioners and clarified that the petitioners would continue to be liable for penalties under the Act. The petitions were disposed of accordingly.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Companies Law</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 04 Nov 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=388070</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>